Adult

Management of infected neurosurgical shunts (VP and EVD)

Warning

The term “shunt” includes the following in this guideline:- Ventriculo-peritoneal (VP), Ventriculo-atrial (VA) and Ventriculo-pleural (V-pleural) shunts, external-ventricular drains (EVD), Ommaya reservoirs.

Causative Organisms

  • Coagulase-negative staphylococci (Staphylococcus epidermidis) account for the majority of infections in VP shunts.
  • Other organisms include Staphylococcus aureusCutibacterium (Propionibacterium) acnes, streptococci, enterococci, corynebacteria.
  • Gram-negative organisms including Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are more common in EVDs.
  • Rare causes include fungi, Mycobacteria and Nocardia.

Mechanisms of Infection

  • Contamination (at implantation)
  • Externalisation (erosion of shunt through skin)
  • Retrograde infection (bowel perforation)
  • Haematogenous (rare) 

Prevention of infection

Perioperative prophylaxis for CSF shunt placement including EVD, is found in Neurosurgery

  • A single EVD can be used for as long as clinically indicated, unless a change is necessary because of persistent CSF infection or catheter malfunction.
  • Prophylactic exchange of EVD does not significantly decrease the likelihood of CSF infection.
  • The use of post-placement prophylactic prolonged systemic antimicrobials for prevention of infection is not recommended [2].
  • Current practice at OUH is for the use of  rifampicin-impregnated EVDs which are tunelled for 10cm or more sub-cutaneously

Clinical features of shunt infection

These are variable and depend on the patient’s age, responsible microorganism, the site of infection (proximal vs distal) and loss of shunt function.

  • New headache, nausea, lethargy, and/or change in mental status.
  • Erythema and tenderness over the subcutaneous shunt tubing.
  • Symptoms and signs of peritonitis or abdominal tenderness, in patients with VP shunts.
  • Symptoms and signs of pleuritis in patients with V-pleural shunts.
  • Demonstration of blood stream infection in a patient with a VA shunt, in the absence of another clear source of blood stream infection.
  • Meningeal signs are uncommon and the absence of fever does not exclude infection.

Laboratory investigations

Collect specimens for microbiology before starting antimicrobial therapy where possible.

  • Blood tests. Full blood count, ESR, CRP, U&E, creatinine, liver function tests, glucose. A normal white cell count, ESR and CRP do not exclude shunt infection. Unexplained renal disease in a patient with a CSF shunt  (particularly VA shunt) may be due to “shunt nephritis”. 
  • Blood cultures. In patients with VA shunt infections, the positivity approaches 90% when multiple cultures are drawn. Blood cultures are rarely positive with VP shunt infection.
  • CSF examination-before starting antimicrobial therapy if possible.
    • Lumbar puncture/shunt tap should be discussed with the neurosurgical team (OARS referral). CSF samples are usually taken from the shunt reservoir and occasionally via lumbar puncture.
    • Request urgent CSF analysis for MC&S, protein and glucose. For other tests (e.g. suspected TB or fungal infection) liaise with Microbiology.
    • None of the classical CSF findings in meningitis are specific for shunt infection. CSF white cell counts in samples obtained by shunt aspiration tend to be lower than when CSF is obtained after lumbar puncture.
    • In patients with obstructive hydrocephalus, CSF obtained by LP may not be in communication with the ventricular space, therefore may not be interpretable (2).
    • A negative CSF Gram stain does not exclude the presence of infection.
    • CSF should be cultured for at least 10 days in an attempt to identify slower growing organisms such as Propionibacterium (Cutibacteriumacnes.
    • If a CSF shunt or drain is removed in patients suspected of having infection, cultures of shunt and drain components are recommended. This will include the proximal catheter, valve or reservoir, and a distal catheter.
  • Peritoneal fluid should be sent for culture if there is evidence of peritoneal inflammation in a VP shunt

Imaging

  • Contrast -enhanced  CT scan or Magnetic resonance imaging (with gadolinium enhancement and diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging) is recommended for detecting abnormalities such as hydrocephalus, material with restricted water diffusion in the ventricular space and ependimal enhancement. The use of contrast and DW images may help to identify ventriculitis. Contrast enhanced scans may not be needed if there is strong clinical suspicion of infection.
  • Ultrasound/CT of the abdomen are recommended to detect CSF loculations at the VP shunt terminus in patients with abdominal symptoms.
  • Chest XR. If ventriculo-atrial or ventriculo-pleural shunt
  • Echocardiogram. Consider if ventriculo-atrial shunt to reveal potential thrombi at the distal end of the atrial catheter and/or tricuspid endocarditis

Treatment

There are a number of treatment options which have differing cure rates when treating VP shunts:

  • Intravenous antimicrobial therapy only: 25-35%
  • Intravenous + intrathecal antimicrobial therapy: 30–35%
  • Intravenous antimicrobial therapy and single stage exchange: 65%  
  • Intravenous  antimicrobial therapy+ with two stage exchange: 88–90%

Antibiotic management

Antibiotic guidelines for the treatment of suspected shunt infection are found in Shunt (CNS) infection: (VA / VP shunt); EVD (external ventricular drain) or lumbar drain (LD)

Surgical management/shunt removal

  • Management of shunt infections without removal of shunt hardware is associated with a poor outcome, and a high mortality rate [5,6].
  • Once a shunt infection is diagnosed including infected EVD, for the majority of cases, the entire device should be removed and replaced with an interim external ventricular drain, ideally at a different site.
  • A conservative management plan with device retention (systemic antibiotics plus intraventricular antimicrobial therapy through a separate ventricular access device) may be appropriate for selected patients (usually those with high perioperative surgical risk or poor short-term outcome) who may have CSF shunt infections caused by less virulent organisms, such as coagulase-negative staphylococci. and Cutibacterium (Propionibacteriumacnes [7].

Intrathecal/ intraventicular antimicrobial therapy (IVT)

Always consult Adult or Paeds ID team

Intraventricular antimicrobial therapy should not be used as a substitute for prompt and effective source control and shunt removal. Pharmacokinetics of intraventricular antimicrobials are complex and depend on ability to redistribute after instillation, CSF clearance rates, presence of hydrocephalus/haemorrhage and rate of instillation. 

 

Intraventricular antimicrobial therapy may be considered an option for the following groups of patients:

  • patients with healthcare-associated ventriculitis in which the infection responds poorly to systemic antimicrobial therapy alone (ongoing clinical signs after 48h or persistent positive culture on day 5),
  • suboptimal systemic antimicrobial options usually due to resistance
  • shunt retention/ salvage when removal is delayed/ not possible [2]


It is recommended that when an antibiotic is given intrathecally, it should also be given IV. 

Rationale for administration of intraventricular therapy is based on a less pronounced ability of antimicrobials to penetrate the BBB in ventriculitis because of a mild inflammatory response [5,6]. The theoretical benefits of IVT antimicrobial administration should be weighed against any potential for toxicity. The efficacy and safety of this route of administration have not been demonstrated in controlled trials and there is insufficient evidence to recommend their general use. Penicillins, cephalosporins and ciprofloxacin should not be given by the intrathecal route because they have been associated with significant neurotoxicity and/or seizures.

Intraventricular antimicrobial therapy may be considered an option for the following groups of patients:

  • patients with healthcare-associated ventriculitis in which the infection responds poorly to systemic antimicrobial therapy alone (ongoing clinical signs after 48h or persistant positive culture on day 5),
  • suboptimal systemic antimicrobial options usually due to resistance
  • shunt retention/ salvage when removal is delayed/ not possible [2]

Reimplantation of the new shunt and duration of treatment

  • The optimal timing of shunt reimplantation is unclear and it should be individualized based on the isolated organism, severity of ventriculitis, and improvement of CSF. Typical duration of therapy ranges from 7 to 21 days.  Longer durations may be warranted in cases of difficult to treat microorganisms, persistent positive CSF cultures, brain abscesses, fulminant ependymitis and in immunocompromised patients.
  • The 2017 IDSA Practice Guidelines for Healthcare-Associated Ventriculitis and Meningitis recommends the following durations, however this needs to be discussed on a case by case basis with the Adult or Paediatric ID team [2]:

 

Microorganism

Shunt reimplantation

Duration of treatment

Coagulase negative

Staphylococcus

or

Cutibacterium acnes

CSF cultures negative for

7 days after externalisation (**)

10 days

after the last positive culture

Staphylococcus aureus

CSF cultures negative for

10 days after externalisation

10-14 days

after the last positive culture

Gram negative rods

CSF cultures negative for

10 days after externalisation

14-21days

after the last positive culture

** If  no associated CSF abnormalities and with negative CSF cultures for 48 hours after externalization, a new shunt could be reimplanted as soon as the third day after removal

 

  • When reimplanting and EVD, it is typically placed into a different hole through the skull to the previous EVD, but not necessarily into the contralateral ventricle. The two ventricles are connected anatomically and there is no evidence that placement in the other ventricle this will reduce infection risks.
  • For reimplantation of VP shunt, the new shunt is typically placed back into the original hole/ track once the EVD has been placed for a few days in a different location.
  • The risk of infection does increase with EVD duration, hence prompt removal of the external ventricular drain when no longer needed is strongly recommended. Should the EVD become infected in a shunt-dependent patient, an exchange of the ventriculostomy is warranted.
  • If device reimplantation is postponed for up to 2 days of the initially recommended antimicrobial plan, antibiotics should be continued until the procedure has been carried out but, if it is delayed for longer periods, antibiotics should be discontinued and CSF  samples monitored in order to verify clearing of the infection 2-3 days before shunt reimplantation.   

References

  1. Ratilal B, Costa J, Sampaio C. Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical introduction of intracranial ventricular shunts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; CD005365.
  2. Tunkel AR, Hasbun R, Bhimraj A, et al. 2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America's Clinical Practice Guidelines for Healthcare-Associated Ventriculitis and Meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2017; 64(6): e34–e65.
  3. Morris A, Low DE. Nosocomial bacterial meningitis, including central nervous system shunt infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1999;13(3):735-50.
  4. Banks JT, Bharara S, Tubbs RS, et al. Polymerase chain reaction for the rapid detection of cerebrospinal fluid shunt or ventriculostomy infections. Neurosurgery 2005; 57(6):1237-43.
  5. Schreffler RT, Schreffler AJ, Wittler RR. Treatment of cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections: a decision analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002; 21:632–6.
  6. James HE, Walsh JW, Wilson HD, Connor JD. The management of cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections: a clinical experience.Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1981; 59:157–66.
  7. Brown EM, Edwards RJ, Pople IK. Conservative management of patients with cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections. Neurosurgery 2006; 58:657–65.
  8. Cook AM, Mieure KD, Owen RD, et al. Intracerebroventricular administration of drugs. Pharmacotherapy. 2009;29:832–45.
  9. van de Beek D, Drake JM, Tunkel AR. Nosocomial bacterial meningitis. N Engl Med 2010; 362:146–54.
  10. Pfausler B, Haring HP, Kampfl A, et al. Cerebrospinalfluid (CSF) pharmacokinetics of intraventricular vancomycin in patients with staphylococcal ventriculitis associated with external CSF drainage. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25(3):733-5.
  11. Ziai WC, Lewin JJ. Improving the role of intraventricular antimicrobial agents in the management of meningitis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2009;22(3):277-82.
  1. Ng K, Mabasa VH, Chow I, et al. Systematic Review of Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Administration of Intraventricular Vancomycin in Adults. Neurocrit Care. 2014; 20:158–71.
  2. Beenen LF, Touw DJ, Hekker TA, et al. Pharmacokinetics of intraventricularly administered teicoplanin in staphylococci ventriculitis. Pharm World Sci. 2000;22:127–9.
  3. Lebras M, Chow I, Mabasa VH, et al. Systematic Review of Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Administration of Intraventricular Aminoglycosides in Adult. Neurocrit Care. 2016; 25:492–507
  4. Grondahl TO, Langmoen IA. Epileptogenic effect of antibiotic drugs. J Neurosurg 1993;78:938–43.
  5. Reesor C, Chow AW, Kureishi A, et al. Kinetics of intraventricular vancomycin in infections of cerebrospinal fluid shunts. J Infect Dis. 1988;158(5):1142–3.
  6. Brown EM, de Louvois J, Bayston R, et al. The management of neurosurgical patients with postoperative bacterial or aseptic meningitis or external ventricular drain-associated ventriculitis. Infection in Neurosurgery Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Br J Neurosurg. 2000; 14(1):7-12.

Editorial Information

Next review date: 01 Dec 2025